Current:Home > MarketsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Prime Capital Blueprint
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
TrendPulse Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-07 16:40:18
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (4899)
Related
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Just Say Yes to Jason Kelce and Kylie Kelce's Love Story
- Turkey’s main opposition party elects Ozgur Ozel as new leader
- What is daylight saving time saving, really? Hint: it may not actually be time or money
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Is love in the air? Travis Kelce asked if he's in love with Taylor Swift. Here's what he said.
- This winning coach is worth the wait for USWNT, even if it puts Paris Olympics at risk
- What young athletes can learn from the late Frank Howard – and not Bob Knight
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Why was daylight saving time started? Here's what you need to know.
Ranking
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Judge in Trump fraud trial issues new gag order on attorneys after dispute over clerk
- Ukraine minister says he wants to turn his country into a weapons production hub for the West
- Bob Knight: 'He never really let the world see the good side.' But it was there.
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Colorado football players get back some items stolen from Rose Bowl locker room
- VPR's Ariana Madix Reveals the Name Tom Sandoval Called Her After Awkward BravoCon Reunion
- Tens of thousands of ancient coins have been found off Sardinia. They may be spoils of a shipwreck
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Proof Nick Carter’s Love of Fatherhood Is Larger Than Life
Iranians mark the anniversary of the 1979 US embassy takeover while calling for a ceasefire in Gaza
WWE Crown Jewel takeaways: Kairi Sane has big return, while Solo Sikoa and LA Knight shine
Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
Celebrities running in the 2023 NYC Marathon on Sunday
Humanoid robots are here, but they’re a little awkward. Do we really need them?
A Norway spruce from West Virginia is headed to the US Capitol to be this year’s Christmas tree