Current:Home > MyThe Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the Constitution -Prime Capital Blueprint
The Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the Constitution
View
Date:2025-04-16 02:52:18
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution.
The justices will review laws enacted by Republican-dominated legislatures and signed by Republican governors in Florida and Texas. While the details vary, both laws aim to prevent the social media companies from censoring users based on their viewpoints.
The court’s announcement, three days before the start of its new term, comes as the justices continue to grapple with how laws written at the dawn of the digital age, or earlier, apply to the online world.
The justices had already agreed to decide whether public officials can block critics from commenting on their social media accounts, an issue that previously came up in a case involving then-President Donald Trump. The court dismissed the Trump case when his presidential term ended in January 2021.
Separately, the high court also could consider a lower-court order limiting executive branch officials’ communications with social media companies about controversial online posts.
The new case follows conflicting rulings by two appeals courts, one of which upheld the Texas law, while the other struck down Florida’s statute. By a 5-4 vote, the justices kept the Texas law on hold while litigation over it continues.
But the alignment was unusual. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted to grant the emergency request from two technology industry groups that challenged the law in federal court.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan and Neil Gorsuch would have allowed the law to remain in effect. In dissent, Alito wrote, “Social media platforms have transformed the way people communicate with each other and obtain news.”
Proponents of the laws, including Republican elected officials in several states that have similar measures, have sought to portray social media companies as generally liberal in outlook and hostile to ideas outside of that viewpoint, especially from the political right.
The tech sector warned that the laws would prevent platforms from removing extremism and hate speech.
Without offering any explanation, the justices had put off consideration of the case even though both sides agreed the high court should step in.
The justices had other social media issues before them last year, including a plea the court did not embrace to soften legal protections tech companies have for posts by their users.
veryGood! (5242)
Related
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Global watchdog urges UN Security Council to consider all options to protect Darfur civilians
- Consumers spent $5.6 billion on Thanksgiving Day — but not on turkey
- College football bold predictions for Week 13: Florida State's season spoiled?
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Officials in Texas investigating the death of a horse killed and dumped on Thanksgiving
- Irish writer Paul Lynch wins Booker Prize for dystopian novel 'Prophet Song'
- Beyoncé's 'Renaissance' film premieres: Top moments from the chrome carpet
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Schools in Portland, Oregon, reach tentative deal with teachers union after nearly month-long strike
Ranking
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Violence erupts in Dublin in response to knife attack that wounded 3 children
- Pope Francis says he has lung inflammation but will go to Dubai this week for climate conference
- Digging to rescue 41 workers trapped in a collapsed tunnel in India halted after machine breaks
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Florida's Jamari Lyons ejected after spitting at Florida State's Keiondre Jones
- Rosalynn Carter tributes will highlight her reach as first lady, humanitarian and small-town Baptist
- 9-year-old girl killed by falling school gate in Arizona; sheriff says no criminal violations
Recommendation
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
Israeli forces kill at least 8 Palestinians in surging West Bank violence, health officials say
These Secrets About the Twilight Franchise Will Be Your Life Now
The Bachelor's Ben Flajnik Is Married
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
Becky G Reveals How She Found Her Inner Strength By Making This Lifestyle Change
Michigan football has shown it can beat Ohio State. Now it's time to beat everyone else.
Florida sheriff’s deputies shoot driver who pointed rifle at them after high speed chase