Current:Home > StocksArizona lawmakers agree to let voters decide on retention rules for state Supreme Court justices -Prime Capital Blueprint
Arizona lawmakers agree to let voters decide on retention rules for state Supreme Court justices
View
Date:2025-04-14 22:48:27
PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona lawmakers voted Wednesday to send an initiative to the November ballot that would protect two state Supreme Court justices targeted for removal from the bench over their support for a near-total abortion ban dating back to the Civil War.
Both chambers of the Legislature agreed to allow voters to decide Nov. 5 whether to eliminate the terms of six years for Supreme Court justices and four years for Superior Court judges in large counties. That will allow them to serve indefinitely “during good behavior,” unless decided otherwise by a judicial review commission, and avoid a retention vote on the ballot each time their term ends.
As a ballot initiative, the proposed law would bypass Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, a strong supporter of reproductive rights who signed a Legislature-approved repeal of the 1864 law this spring.
Several Democrats who voted against the measure noted that the retention rules were championed by the late former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who had been an Arizona state senator and Superior Court and Appellate Court judge.
The retention system “provides the kinds of checks and balances critical to our democracy,” said Sen. Flavio Bravo. “It would be a shame to take this action six months after Justice Day O’Connor’s passing, and I vote no.”
Republican Sen. Dave Gowan, the bill’s sponsor, noted that judges would still be subject to judicial review by a committee “to say if they don’t belong.”
The measure will likely appear on the ballot alongside an initiative that would enshrine the right to abortion in the Arizona Constitution.
The final Senate vote on the judicial ballot initiative was 16-10, with four senators not voting. Republican Sen. Shawnna Bolick, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick, ignored requests by several colleagues to recuse herself and voted in favor.
Justices Bolick and Kathryn Hackett King joined the majority on the high court in April in voting to restore the 1864 abortion ban. They are the only two on the Supreme Court who are up for retention votes in November.
Both were appointed by former Republican Gov. Doug Ducey, who expanded the court from five to seven justices in 2016.
If approved by voters, the measure would apply retroactively to Oct. 31, days before the election, and would effectively throw out the results of any vote on judicial retention this year.
If it fails and voters also opt to unseat Hackett King and Bolick, Hobbs can pick their replacements.
“They definitely are ramming it through,” said Abigail Jackson, a spokesperson for Progress Arizona, a group advocating for the judges’ removal. “We will continue to do our work to inform the voters that this will take away their power.”
Democrats have put abortion at the center of their quest to take control of the state Legislature for the first time in decades. Sen. Bolick, representing one of the most competitive districts, is a key target.
veryGood! (3516)
Related
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Boeing declines to give a financial outlook as it focuses on quality and safety
- Grading every college football coaching hire this offseason from best to worst
- Music from Memphis’ Stax Records, Detroit’s Motown featured in online show
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Chita Rivera, revered and pioneering Tony-winning dancer and singer, dies at 91
- Massachusetts man shot dead after crashing truck, approaching officer with knife
- PGA Tour strikes $3 billion deal with Fenway-led investment group. Players to get equity ownership
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- We all publicly salivate over Jeremy Allen White. Should we?
Ranking
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- UK lawmakers are annoyed that Abramovich’s frozen Chelsea funds still haven’t been used for Ukraine
- Kat Von D wins lawsuit over Miles Davis tattoo, says her 'heart has been crushed' by trial
- Days of Darkness: How one woman escaped the conspiracy theory trap that has ensnared millions
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Early voting suspended for the day in Richmond after heating system failure releases smoke and fumes
- After Another Year of Record-Breaking Heat, a Heightened Focus on Public Health
- Fisher-Price restocking baby 'Stanley cup' toy after parents bought up inventory
Recommendation
The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
How U.S. Marshals captured pro cyclist Moriah Mo Wilson's killer
Stolen phone? New theft protection security feature in Ios 17.3 update is here to help
Family of child burned in over-chlorinated resort pool gets $26 million settlement
Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
After Another Year of Record-Breaking Heat, a Heightened Focus on Public Health
Live, Laugh, Lululemon: Win Over Your Valentine's Heart With These Wishlist-Worthy Gifts
Ex-US Open champ Scott Simpson details why he's anti-LIV, how Greg Norman became 'a jerk'