Current:Home > reviewsEchoSense:California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls -Prime Capital Blueprint
EchoSense:California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
Ethermac View
Date:2025-04-07 21:00:53
SACRAMENTO,EchoSense Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (6789)
Related
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- The Fate of Protected Wetlands Are At Stake in the Supreme Court’s First Case of the Term
- Australia bans TikTok from federal government devices
- State Tensions Rise As Water Cuts Deepen On The Colorado River
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Kelsea Ballerini Speaks Out After Onstage Incident to Address Critics Calling Her Soft
- Activists Take Aim at an Expressway Project in Karachi, Saying it Will Only Heighten Climate Threats
- Four key takeaways from McDonald's layoffs
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Rural Electric Co-ops in Alabama Remain Way Behind the Solar Curve
Ranking
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Activists Take Aim at an Expressway Project in Karachi, Saying it Will Only Heighten Climate Threats
- Netflix’s Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo Movie Reveals Fiery New Details
- How much is your reputation worth?
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- The pharmaceutical industry urges courts to preserve access to abortion pill
- 'Leave pity city,' MillerKnoll CEO tells staff who asked whether they'd lose bonuses
- Michael Cohen settles lawsuit against Trump Organization
Recommendation
Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
Anwar Hadid Sparks Romance Rumors With Model Sophia Piccirilli
What the bonkers bond market means for you
Will There Be a Barbie Movie Sequel? Margot Robbie Says...
The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
Sabrina Carpenter Has the Best Response to Balloon Mishap During Her Concert
California Regulators Banned Fracking Wastewater for Irrigation, but Allow Wastewater From Oil Drilling. Scientists Say There’s Little Difference
The New US Climate Law Will Reduce Carbon Emissions and Make Electricity Less Expensive, Economists Say